M.B.GHODESWAR, R.M.LODHA
Mayuri Pulse Mills and others – Appellant
Versus
Union of India and others – Respondent
2. Before we appreciate the submissions made by the learned Counsel challenging the provisions of sections 138, 139, 140 and 141 of the N.I. Act as ultra vires and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, briefly the facts of Criminal Writ Petition No. 91 of 1994 may be adverted to.
3. It is alleged in Criminal Writ Petition No. 91 of 1994 M/s. Mayuri Pulse Mills and others v. Union of India and others, that the respondent No. 4 Parmanand Mohanlal Rathi, Proprietor M/s Rathi Trading Company filed the complaint against the petitioners under section 142 of the N.I. Act alleging that the petitioners have committed offences under section 138 and 141 of the N.I. Act. According to the complaint, the petitioners
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.