SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

N.A.BRITTO
ARMSTRONG BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS – Appellant
Versus
VISHVANA THNAIK – Respondent


JUDGMENT :- This is a complainant's appeal against the acquittal of the accused under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act, for short).

2. The case of the complainant was that he was the Proprietor of Armstrong Builders and Developers and that on 22-1-2004 the accused had taken a cash loan from the complainant for a period of three months and in part discharge of the said liability the accused had issued a cheque bearing No. 112888 dated 22-4-2004 drawn on the Bicholim Urban Co-op. Bank Limited for a sum of Rupees One Lakh and when the cheque was presented for payment, the same was returned dishonoured with remark dated 2-7-2004 that the funds were insufficient. The complainant sent the notice dated 6-7-2004, which according to the complainant, the accused received on 7-7-2004 but failed to comply with the same within a period of fifteen days and therefore the complainant prosecuted the accused by filing the complaint on 20-8-2004.

3. In support of the complaint, the complainant examined himself and produced the necessary documents including the cheque, the memorandum of dishonour, copy of the registered notice along with the A.D.

4. The case of the accused in h










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top