SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.K.SIKRI
V. P. MAINRA – Appellant
Versus
DAWSONS LEASING LIMITED – Respondent


A. K. SIKRI, J.

( 1 ) IN CP No. 323/99 filed by Dr. V. P. Mainra (petitioner) against M/s Dawson Leasing Limited, provisional Liquidator was appointed on 9th November, 2000 and the petition was admitted to hearing. The provisional Liquidator was also asked to take in his possession the assets, records and books of accounts of the respondent company (hereinafter referred to as `the company ) He has taken charge of the liquidation affairs of the company since then, although final winding up orders have not been passed in this case. It may be mentioned that statement of ex-Directors is recorded under Rule 130 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. They have also filed the statement of affairs. Since there are certain deficiencies therein, ex- directors are called upon to remove those deficiencies.

( 2 ) WHILE that is the present status of the winding up proceedings, these CAs are filed which primarily relate to transfer of certain cases and execution proceedings pending before the Consumer Disputes redressal Forum, Ghaziabad and New Delhi under the consumer Protection Act, 1986 to this court. All these applications are filed by ex-Directors of the company (in provisional liquidation ).




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top