SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
ATUL KUMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
JALVEEN ROSHA – Respondent


M. S. A, Siddiqui, J.

( 1 ) BY this order, I propose to dispose of the application Filed by the defendant under Order 7, Rule II, CPC.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff filed this suit tor declaration and permanent injunction on the allegations that the plaintiff was interested in purchasing a flat for his residence. He, therefore, approached the defendant, who was dealing in real estate business. Some time in the month of December, 1994 the defendant informed the plaintiff about a flat offered lor sale for Rs. 7,00,000. 00. Due to financial constraints, the plaintiff expressed his inability to pay the entire consideration in a lumpsum. However, on the defendant s suggestion to furnish some security in the form of bearer cheques for finalising the deal, the plaintiff issued the following bearer cheques in favour of the defendant.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the plaintiff, he deliberately omitted to mention the date of issue on the said cheques and it was agreed between the parties that the defendant would lake the plaintiff into confidence before their presentation for encasement. Some lime in the second week of April, 1996, the plaintiff desired to call off the deal and requested the defendant to return











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top