SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.R.RAJASEKHARA MURTHY
G. Jayalaxamma – Appellant
Versus
H. M. Lingegowda – Respondent


S. R. RAJASEKHARA MURTHY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Second Appeal by the plaintiff. Plaintiff-appellant filed O. S. No. 197 of 1972 on the file of the Munsiff, Srirangapatna, for recovery of money due under a promissory note executed by the defendant-respondent in favour of one Venkatalakshamma, in evidence of borrowal of a loan of Rs. 3,000/- on 2. 5. 1969. The plaintiff is the assignee of the said pronote for consideration as per the endorsement dated 18. 5. 1969. Defendant paid- Rs. 1,000/- towards the debt on 22. 2. 1971 through one h. R. Visveswaraiah and the suit was filed for the balance.

( 2 ) THE suit was resisted by the defendant on several grounds. The defendant did not admit the endorsement on the said pronote as true and the plaintiff was called upon to prove the same. The learned Munsiff, besides other issues, framed an additional issue as follows:"whether the endorsement made by Ven- katalakshmma in favour of the plaintiff is true?"the suit was decreed as prayed for with costs, after contest. In the defendant's appeal against the said decree before the Court of the Prl. Civil Judge, mandya, the decree was set aside and the suit was dismissed. It is this judgement and decree












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top