SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.P.CHANDRAKANTARAJ, M.RAMAKRISHNA RAO
India Saree Museum – Appellant
Versus
P. Kapurchand – Respondent


( 1 ) 1. This is a 1st defendant's appeal directed against the Judgment and Decree dated 31-10-1986 passed in OS. No. 1136/1980 on the file of the II Additional City Civil Judge, bangalore City. In the course of this Judgment we will refer to the parties by the ranks assigned to them in the trial Court.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff-Kapurchand, a businessman carrying on business at Bangalore paid in all a sum of Rs. 60,000/- to the defendant, a partnership firm, discounting three cheques drawn by the 1st defendant in favour of the 2nd defendant. He obtained on printed discount forms the signatures of the partner of the 2nd defendant firm evidencing payment of cash to the 2nd defendant. When the cheques were presented after the due dates, they came to be dishonoured. Therefore, the suit for recovery of money together with interest at 18 per cent per annum which the 2nd defendant to pay at the time of discounting in case of dishonour of the cheques. The defendants were served with notice of suit and only the 1st defendant entered appearance. The 2nd defendant did not appear and therefore he was placed ex parte.

( 3 ) THE 1st defendant filed the written statement admitting the fact of having dr










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top