SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

G.PATRI BASAVANA GOUD
ISHWAR RAMA GUNAGA – Appellant
Versus
RAMDAS ANANT PRABHU – Respondent


G. PATRI BASAVANA GOUD, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant-complainant is aggrieved by the order of the learned judicial Magistrate First Class, Kumta, dated 25-4-2001, in C. C. No. 1928 of 1996, by which, the respondent-accused has been acquitted of an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ('act' for short ).

( 2 ) THE appellant-complainant presented, on 31-10-1994 to the Bank for encashment, a cheque allegedly issued by the respondent in his favour for a sum of Rs. 35,000/ -. On 3-11-1994, the appellant-complainant received intimation regarding its dishonour. On 14-11-1994, he issued notice to the respondent-accused demanding payment of the amount. The said notice was served on the respondent-accused on 2-12-1994. The appellant-complainant filed a complaint under Section 200 of the Criminal procedure Code on 12-12-1994. The learned Magistrate took cognizance on the same day, i. e. , on 12-12-1994, recorded the sworn statement, found sufficient ground to proceed, and directed issuing of process for the offence under Section 138 of the Act, in answer to which, the respondent appeared and, after recording of the plea, both went to trial, and it is thereafte




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top