SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

M.M.KUMAR
Nambhi Raj – Appellant
Versus
Adarsh Diwan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Mr. B.S. Rana, Advoacte.
For the Respondent: None

Judgment

M.M. Kumar, J.—This petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity, ‘Cr.P.C.’) prays for quashing Order dated 13.11.2000 passed by Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Gurgaon restoring the complaint of the respondent to its original number and the Order dated 24.9.2000 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge upholding the aforesaid Order of restoration of the Magistrate.

2. The complainant-respondent filed a complaint under Section 138/142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and on account of non-appearance of the complainant, the complaint was dismissed on 4.10.2000. When the complainant filed an application for restoration of the complaint., the Magistrate accepted the application by relying upon a Judgment of the Supreme Court in the case Associated Cement Co. Ltd. v. Keshavanand1 on the ground that the complaint was at the initial stage of summoning the accused-petitioner and the date was fixed for taking further steps towards progress of the complaint. It was further held that the Magistrate was competent to issue process for the purposes of securing the presence of the accused-petitioner. Against the aforementioned Order, the acc









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top