SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.S.SARON
Bharat Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Ram Swarath Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the petitioners:Ashok Devgan, Advocate
For the respondents:C.S. Pasricha , Advocate

Judgment

S.S. Saron, J.—This Order will dispose of Criminal Revision Nos. 91 and 92 of 2000 as they are between the same parties and contain somewhat identical facts and common questions of law have been raised.

2. The facts are, however, taken from Criminal Revision No. 91 of 2000.

3. The petitioners, who are complainants before the Trial Court filed Criminal complaint dated 8.1. 1999 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (Act for short), on the allegation that the petitioners (complainants) and the respondents (accused) had entered into a partnership business of contractors under the name and style of M/s. R.S. Singh Electricals. The said partnership was dissolved vide dissolution deed dated 1.1. 1998 and all the four partners had agreed that the petitioners Bharat Kumar and Sameer Singh to be the outgoing partners and left all the rights in the said firm with the accused persons namely Ram Swarath Singh and Mrs. Sarita Devi on the payment of various sums of money as contained and incorporated in the dissolution deed. It is not necessary to go into the other aspects of the matter as regards the dissolution. However, it may be briefly mentioned that it was ag














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top