S.L. Kochar, J.—This petition under Section 482 of the Cr. P.C. has been filed by applicant mainly on the ground that the complaint was filed by the power of attorney holder who is not the payee or holder of cheque in due course. Therefore, the compliant filed by the power of attorney is not maintainable.

2.The learned Counsel for the applicant placed reliance on (S.P. Sampathy v. Smt. Manju Gupta)1 on the other hand, the contention of the learned Counsel for the non-applicant/ complainant is that as per the Power of Attorney Act and the Judgment rendered by M.P. High Court (Gwalior Bench) in Dr. Anil Kumar and another v. Sant Praksh Gutpa2, the complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act be presented by the person holding power of attorney, payee or the holder of the cheque. Learned Counsel has also placed reliance on the Supreme Court Judgment rendered in M/s MMTC Ltd. and Another v. M/s Medchi Chemicals and Pharma (P) Ltd.3, and submitted that in the case in hand, though the complaint was filed by the holder of power of attorney on behalf of the complainant, but later on this defect has been cured. The complainant himself has appeared and signed on th