R.BASANT
Abdul Nazar – Appellant
Versus
Dileepkumar – Respondent
R. Basant, J.—What are the ramifications of the right to silence—the glorious right to silence as it is often referred to, in a criminal prosecution under Section138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act? Is Section 3l5 of the Cr.P.C. applicable in such a prosecution? These questions arise for consideration incidentally in this revision petition.
2. This revision petition is directed against a concurrent verdict of guilty, conviction and sentence in a prosecution under Section138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
3. The cheque is for an amount of Rs.20,000. Signature in the cheque is admitted. The cheque was dishonoured on the ground of insufficiency of funds. Notice of demand, though duly received and acknowledged, did not evoke any response. No defence evidence whatsoever was adduced before the trial Court. The complainant examined himself as P.W. 1 and proved Exts.P. 1 to P. 11. At the stage of trial, a contention was raised that the cheque was not issued voluntarily for the discharge of any legally enforcement debt/liability. Some miscreants had trespassed into the house of the accused. The father of the accused owed amounts to some of those miscreants in some transaction. Th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.