P.S.BRAHME, R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
Madan Govardhandas Goenka – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
R. M. S. Khandeparkar, J.—Heard. Perused the records.
2. The petitioner seeks to challenge the proceedings initiated against him under the provisions of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter called as the said Act) as well as the provisions of Section 138 of the said Act.
3. The petitioner is a businessman running a Dal Mill under the name and style of Goenka Industry at Akola. In the course of business certain transactions took place between the petitioner and the respondent No.2. A complaint came to be filed by respondent No.2 under Section 138 of the said Act in the court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Akola. According to the respondent No.2 a sum of Rs.3,00,000 was found to be outstanding against the petitioner on 23.1.1999 and in respect thereof a postdated cheque was issued on Akola Janata Commercial Cooperative Bank Ltd. The cheque was dated 28.12.1999. It was presented to the bank for encashment on 24.6.2000 but it was dishonoured and, therefore, a notice of 15 days was served upon the petitioner on 4.7.2000 and since the petitioner failed to pay the money within the stipulated time, a complaint came to be filed on 14.8.2000. Conseq
1.Anil Kumar Sawhney v. Gulshah Rai
2.Ashok Yeshwant Badeve v. Surendra Madhavrao and another
3.Goplast Private Ltd. v. Shri Chico Ursula D’Souza and another
4.Jolly George Varghese and another v. The Bank of Cochin
5.Vishaka and others v. State of Rajasthan and others
6.People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India and another
8.Maganbhai Ishwarbhai Patel v. Union of India and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.