SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR
Francis Mathew – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:G. Krishna Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor.

Order

M. Sasidharan Nambiar, J. —Accused in C.C. No. 838/99 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate-1, Aluva is the revision petitioner. Second respondent was the complainant. Petitioner was convicted and sentenced to simple imprisonment for six months and compensation of Rs. 80,000 and in default simple imprisonment for six months for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Petitioner challenged conviction and sentence before Additional Sessions Judge, North Paravur in Crl A. No. 590/03. Learned Additional Sessions Judge after analysing and re-appraising the evidence confirmed conviction and sentence and dismissed appeal. Petitioner has preferred this revision from jail. Advocate Krishna Kumar was appointed as State Brief.

2. Case of second respondent was that petitioner promising to secure a job for Rasheed, brother of P.W.1, in Premier Tyres Ltd., Kalamassery obtained Rs. 80,000 and when he failed to arrange job second respondent demanded back the amount and then petitioner issued Ext. P2 cheque towards repayment of the amount and when Ext. P2 was presented for encashment, under Exts. P3 and P4 it was dishonoured for want of sufficient funds. Under









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top