SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

POONAM SRIVASTAVA
Ganga Ram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant:Dev Raj, Advocate.
For the Opposite Parties: Muktar Alam AGA.

Order

Poonam Srivastava, J.—Heard Sri Dev Raj Advocate for the applicant and Sri Muktar Alam Advocate for the opposite party Nos. 3 and 4 and learned AGA for the State.

2. This application has been filed challenging the Order dated 27.3.1995 passed by the Judicial Magistrate Nagina, District Bijnor confirmed in Revision No. 156 of 1995 vide Order dated 16.8.1997 by the Additional Session Judge, Bijnor. The facts giving rise to the dispute is that the applicant’s firm M/s Singh Brothers, Dhampur, District Bijnor is a registered firm and deals in the business of Khandsari sugar. The applicant Ganga Ram complainant is managing partner of the firm. The contesting opposite parties are engaged in manufacturing the crystal less (Boora) and used to purchase sugar from the complainant on credit. It is stated that after the accounts were settled, out standing amount of Rs. 53,000 was due against the opposite parties. An account payee cheque dated 25.9.1991 was issued for a sum of Rs. 54,000 drawn in Canara Bank Dharmpur Branch, District Bijnor in the name of Singh Brothers. The cheque was dishonoured for paucity of funds. This information was received by the applicant on 24.3.1992. A written n







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top