SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.R.SINGHARAVELU
Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
R. Ramalingam – Respondent


Order

S.R. Singharavelu, J. —This petition is to quash the private complaint filed in C.C. No.923 of 2004 pending trial before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Karur.

2. That complaint was filed on 20-1-2004 by one R. Ramalingam son of Ramasamy represented by his Power of Attorney, Mr. Subramani describing himself as complainant. The complaint was filed against A.1, i.e. a partnership firm in the name of M/s. Century Food Industries and A.2, the Managing Partner and his wife A.3; along with them, two other persons, the petitioners herein were also arrayed as A.4 and A.5.

3. That complaint was lodged for bouncing of a cheque dated 13-10-2003 for a sum of Rs. 56,00,000/- issued by A.2 in favour of the complainant and therefore, the complaint was preferred under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.

4. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that the cheque was issued on 13-10-2003 and the petitioners retired themselves even on 31-3-2003 and Form-A filed before the Registrar of Firms, Karur, also would show the same in proof of their resignation on 31-2-2003. Learned counsel for petitioners argued that when the petitioners A. 4 and A. 5 have the resigned themselves f









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top