SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.ASHOK KUMAR
AP V. Sundaram – Appellant
Versus
E. Santhalingam – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioneer:Mr.AR.L. Sundaresan, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

Order

S. Ashok Kumar, J.—This Criminal Revision has been filed by the petitioner against the Order of the learned Judicial Magistrate in Crl. M.P. No. 5307 of 2003 in C.C. No.341 of 2003 dated 09.10.2003.

2. The brief facts of the case are as follows: The respondent has filed a complaint against the petitioner who was a partner of the company for dishonour of cheque dated 21.01.2003 for a sum of Rs. 5 lakhs. The revision petitioner filed Cr. M.P. No. 5307 of 2003 under Section 245 of Cr. P.C., to discharge the petitioner on the ground that ever since 30.11. 99 he was not a partner in the firm viz., M/s Shree Arunachaleswarar Mills and that therefore he is not liable for the liability of the partnership firm. The learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Coimbatore dismissed the application filed by the revision petitioner. Aggrieved over the same this revision has been filed.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would contend that on the date of issue of the cheque which is the subject matter of this case, the petitioner was not partner in the firm and in support of the said contention has produced Form-A dated 4.12.2003. He has not produced any paper publication to show that the partners



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top