A.K.PARICHHA
Susanta Kumar Moharana – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Kumar Bhatta – Respondent
A.K. Parichha, J. —Opp. Party as complainant has filed I.C.C. Case No. 113 of 2004 before the Learned S.D.J.M., Nayagarh alleging offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short, “the N.I. Act”) against the petitioner. Learned S.D.J.M., Nayagarh after recording statements of the complainant under Section 200 Cr.P.C. took cognizance of that offence and directed issue of process against the petitioner. Aggrieved, the petitioner has filed the present application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing the said Order dated 27.9.2004 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Nayagarh.
2. Mr.J. Katikia, Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned Order of cognizance is unsustainable as the statement of the complainant recorded under Section 200, Cr.P.C. does not reveal the essential ingredients of the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. According to him, unless prima facie case is revealed from the statements of the complaint and witnesses recorded under Section 200 and 202, Cr.P.C. cognizance of the offence cannot be taken even though allegations are borne on the complaint petition. In support of his contention he relied on the decisi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.