J.P.SINGH
City Palace Electronics – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
J.P. Singh, J.: These petitions have been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing the summoning Order dated 16.11.2004 passed by Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi and for quashing of the complaint and the proceedings emanating therefrom. I have heard Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Siddharath Luthra, learned counsel for respondent and have gone through the impugned Order as also copies of the documents placed on the file.
2. Briefly the facts are that M/s. Sony India Pvt. Ltd, filed a complaint under Section 138 read with Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against M/s City Palace Electronics Pvt. Ltd and its Directors S. Shri Vijay Kumar Chabra, Dinesh Kumar Chabra and Rajinder Kumar Chabra. It is alleged in the complaint that accused No. 1 is a multi-brand dealer and was one of the several hundred authorised dealers of the complainant. Complainant supplied its Sony and AIWA products to accused No. 1 and four running accounts were maintained. The account of Sony branded products was settled till 19.6.2004 when a sum of Rs. 8,16,935 was credited to the account of the accused towards obsolete stock a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.