R.B. Misra, J.—Heard Mr. S. Deb, learned senior Counsel along with Mr. S. Saha, learned Counsel for the accused petitioner and Mr. P .K. Biswas, learned Counsel along with Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, learned Counsel for the complainant respondent.

This Criminal Revision has been preferred under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against an Order passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Tripura, Agartala in C.R. No. 2922 of 2003 on 29.10.2004 whereby learned Trial Court had allowed the prosecution prayer to re-examine the claimant to prove two documents.

2. The brief facts, according to the accused petitioner are that the complainant .respondent had filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and a case was registered as C.R. No. 2922 of 2003 wherein learned trial Court took cognizance of the offences and issued notice upon the accused petitioner to appear before the Court on 27.9.2003, pursuant to which, the accused petitioner appeared and was enlarged on bail however subsequently charge was framed. However, in the examination under Section 200 of Cr.P.C. the complainant respondent has stated that he