MANJU GOEL
Everest Advertising Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
MS. MANJU GOEL, J—THESE ARE TWO PETITIONS UNDER SECTION 482 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE BETWEEN THE SAME PARTIES INVOLVING THE SAME QUESTION OF LAW AND FACTS AND ARE ACCORDINGLY BEING DISPOSED OF BY THIS COMMON Order.
2. THE FACTS IN THE TWO CASES ARE GIVEN BELOW:
CRL. M.C. 3690/2001 TITLED EVEREST ADVERTISING PVT. LTD. V. STATE & ORS.
THE PETITIONER FILED THE COMPLAINT AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 WHO WERE THE CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OF M/S DALMIA INDUSTRIES LTD. AS WELL AS AGAINST M/S DALMIA INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ITS THREE OTHERS WHO WERE THE DIRECTOR (TECHNICAL), EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND SENIOR GENERAL MANAGER (FINANCE). IT WAS ALLEGED THAT THE RESPONDENTS 2 & 3 HEREIN AS WELL AS THE OTHER DIRECTORS NAMED IN THE COMPLAINT WERE IN CHARGE OF AND RESPONSIBLE TO THE COMPANY M/S DALMIA INDUSTRIES LTD. FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY AND WERE LIABLE TO MAKE THE PAYMENT FOR THE CHEQUE IN QUESTION IN THAT COMPLAINT. THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE COMPLAINT WERE CERTAIN CHEQUE MENTIONED IN THE ANNEXURES TO THE COMPLAINT ISSUED BY M/S DALMIA INDUSTRIES LTD, TOWARDS JOB DONE BY THE COMPLAINANT FOR THE ACCUSED COMPANY. THE CHEQUES WERE DISHONOURED BY THE RESPECTIVE B
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.