SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

KAMLESH SHARMA, KULDIP CHAND SOOD
Punjab National Bank – Appellant
Versus
Narain Dass – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Kuldip Chand Sood, J.-This first appeal arises out of the judgment and decree of learned District Judge, Hamirpur dated January 10, 1997 whereby the suit of the appellant Bank, plaintiff before the District Judge, was partly decreed against the respondent-defendant.

2. The facts in brief.

3. Plaintiff Blank is a Body Corporate established under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970 with its head office at New Delhi. Plaintiff Bank has a Branch at Jahu in Tehsil Bhoranj of District Hamirpur of Himachal Pradesh. Vinod Kumar Chadha was the Branch Manager of the Jahu Branch of the plaintiff Bank when the suit was filed. He holds general power of attorney on behalf of the plaintiff Bank and was authorised to maintain the present suit.

4. On August 18, 1987, Bihagat Ram, defendant, who died during the pendency of the suit and was substituted by his legal representatives as defendants 1(a) to 1(c) and respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in this appeal, approached the plaintiff Bank for the grant of term loan of Rs. 1,64,000/- for the purchase of D.C.M. Toyota Make Truck vide his loan application of the even date. The plaintiff Bank sanctioned a sum of Rs.












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top