SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.K.MOHAPATRA
Bank of India, Muzaffarpur – Appellant
Versus
Esspo Sales – Respondent


ORDER

Mr. S.K. Mohapatra, Presiding Officer :This pertains to the petition filed by the defendant No. 2 on 3.12.2001 questioning the jurisdiction of this Tribunal to decide the instant Original Application No. 151/2000 arising from Execution (PT) Case No. 115/98.

2. Heard the arguments of parties and I have also perused the petition and written arguments filed by the applicant Bank.

3. The main contention of the applicant is that the Execution (PT) Case No. 115/98 (Bank of India v. M/s Esspo Sales and Others) has already been dismissed by this Tribunal on 13.9.2000 and, therefore, filing of the original application arising out of the said Execution (PT) No. 115/98 cannot arise. The applicant has also raised objection on the ground of limitation and on the count of principle of res judicata.

4. Applicant Bank on the contrary has contended that their claim filed initially before the Certificate Officer has not yet been adjudicated upon on merit, and, therefore, this Tribunal should adjudicate the claim of Bank. It has also been inter alia contended that on transfer of the certificate proceeding the same has been wrongly registered as execution proceedings and for the mistake of the C











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top