SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.G.SABHAHIT
Nagaraja Upadhya – Appellant
Versus
M. Sanjeevan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Sri Vyasa Rao K.S., Advocate.
For the Respondent:Smt. Rajeevi Shyam, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

V.G. Sabhahit, J.—This appeal by the complainant is directed against the judgment of acquittal passed by the Court of the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Udupi, in Criminal Case No.3325 of 1997, dated 10.7.2001, wherein the respondent has been acquitted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).

The essential facts of the case leading upto this appeal with reference to the rank of the parties before the Trial Court are as follows:

2. The appellant herein filed a private complaint under Section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, against the accused alleging that the accused had borrowed a sum of Rs. 25,000 from the complainant in January 1996 on the pretext that he needed the money urgently for the medical treatment of his close relative. The complainant lent the money in cash, on sympathetic grounds since he knew the accused for several years. The accused promised to repay the amount within two months and there was no agreement to pay any interest. However, the accused did not bother to repay the amount within two months and after persistent reminders, he issued a cheque dat











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top