SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.R.SHAH
B. K. Sarkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.R. Shah, J.—Rule. Mr. P.P. Majmudar, learned Advocate waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.2. Mr. K. T. Dave, learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of respondent No.1.

2. By way of this application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the petitioners-original accused have prayed for an appropriate order to quash and set aside the Criminal Case being No. 506/2005 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surendranagar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (‘N.I. Act’ fort short).

3. A criminal case has been filed by respondent No.2 original complainant in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surendranagar against the petitioners under Section 138 read with Section 142 of the NI Act alleging inter-alia that the petitioners have given cheque No.131423 dated 8.1.2005 for an amount of Rs. 2,37,160. The said cheque was deposited in the Bank and same was returned by the Bank by written memo dated 19.1.2005 with an endorsement ‘insufficient funds’. It is the case on behalf of the complainant in the complaint that the original complainant received intimation with regard to the return of the cheque vide communicati















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top