I.A.ANSARI
Gautam Saikia – Appellant
Versus
Diganta Sarmah – Respondent
I.A. Ansari, J.—The opposite party herein lodged a complaint against the present petitioner, as accused, for his prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (‘the Act’), the complainant’s case being, in brief, thus: The accused issued one cheque, dated 25.10.2005, for Rs. 1,10,000, drawn on UCO Bank, Rajgarh Road Branch, Guwahati, in favour of the complainant, the cheque having been drawn in discharge of the lawful debts of the accused. The complainant deposited the cheque on 26.10.2005, in his account maintained with the ICICI Bank Ltd., Guwahati, for encashment. The said cheque was dishonoured on the ground, inter alia, of insufficiency of fund in the account of the accused and the banker of the complainant returned the cheque to the complainant by a memo, dated 26.10.2005, which was received by the complainant on 10.11.2005. Following the dishonour of the cheque, the complainant sent a notice, dated 22.11.2005, by registered post with A/D, addressed to the accused, demanding payment of the amount, covered by the said cheque, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of the said notice. Though the accused had duly received
1.State of Maharashtra v. Sharad Chandra Vinayak Dongre and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.