SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

I.A.ANSARI
Gautam Saikia – Appellant
Versus
Diganta Sarmah – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. N. Nath, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. N.N. Jha, Advocate.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER

I.A. Ansari, J.—The opposite party herein lodged a complaint against the present petitioner, as accused, for his prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (‘the Act’), the complainant’s case being, in brief, thus: The accused issued one cheque, dated 25.10.2005, for Rs. 1,10,000, drawn on UCO Bank, Rajgarh Road Branch, Guwahati, in favour of the complainant, the cheque having been drawn in discharge of the lawful debts of the accused. The complainant deposited the cheque on 26.10.2005, in his account maintained with the ICICI Bank Ltd., Guwahati, for encashment. The said cheque was dishonoured on the ground, inter alia, of insufficiency of fund in the account of the accused and the banker of the complainant returned the cheque to the complainant by a memo, dated 26.10.2005, which was received by the complainant on 10.11.2005. Following the dishonour of the cheque, the complainant sent a notice, dated 22.11.2005, by registered post with A/D, addressed to the accused, demanding payment of the amount, covered by the said cheque, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of the said notice. Though the accused had duly received


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top