GLR 2009 (1) 312
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
UMIYA PIPE PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER & 2 - Applicant(s)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
Misc. Criminal Application No. 15251 of 2007
Decided on: 24/09/2008
Limitation - Negotiable Instruments Act - 138, 142 - The court considered the relevant date for starting the limitation for filing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The key legal provisions discussed were Section 138 and Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which outline the conditions for dishonour of cheques and the limitation for filing a complaint. The court's decision was influenced by the interpretation of the starting point of limitation and the requirements for making a complaint under the Act.
Fact of the Case:
A complaint was filed against the accused for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, based on a dishonoured cheque. The accused argued that the complaint was beyond the period of limitation, while the complainant contended that the relevant date for limitation was the date of receipt of the reply to the notice.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the complaint was indeed beyond the period of limitation as prescribed under Section 142 read with Section 138(c) of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. It held that the cause of action to make the complaint arose within fifteen days of the receipt of the notice by the accused, and the complaint made after this period was barred by limitation.
Issues: The main issue was the determination of the relevant date for starting the limitation for filing a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Section 138 and Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which outlined the starting point of limitation and the conditions for making a complaint for dishonour of cheques.
Final Decision: The court quashed and set aside the impugned complaint and the order of the trial court, ruling that they were beyond the period of limitation as prescribed under the Act.
1. RULE. Ms. Falguni Patel, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, waives service of rule on behalf of respondent no. 1-State and Shri R.C. Jani, learned advocate waives service of rule on behalf of respondent no. 2.
2. With the consent of the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties, the application is taken up for final hearing today.
3. The short but an interesting question of law posed for consideration of this Court is which date would be the relevant date for starting the limitation for filing the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
4. By way of this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicants-original accused have prayed for an appropriate order to quash and set aside Criminal Case No. 749/2007 pending in the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 5, Ahmedabad filed by respondent no. 2-original complainant for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 as well as the order dated 09/02/2007 passed by the learned trial Court in the aforesaid Criminal Case issuing summons upon the applicants for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
5. A criminal case has been filed by respondent no. 2-original complainant against the applicants and others for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in the Court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 5, Ahmedabad alleging interalia that the cheque for an amount of Rs. 3 Crore was issued by the applicants-original accused and when the said cheque was presented, the same came to be dishonoured/returned with an endorsement âSinsufficient balanceâý. It was the case on behalf of respondent no. 2-original complainant that thereafter the applicants were served with the legal notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and, thereafter, the applicants gave vague reply to the notice but did not make payment, and, therefore, the aforesaid criminal case came to be instituted against the applicants-original accused for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The learned trial Court issued summons upon the applicants and others by impugned order dated 09/02/2007 for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Hence, the applicants-original accused have preferred the present Criminal Miscellaneous Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing and setting aside the complaint.
6. Shri R.S. Sanjanwala, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicants-original accused has vehemently submitted that the impugned complaint/criminal case is beyond the period of limitation as described under Section 138 read with Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. It is submitted that the cheque in question was deposited on 09/12/2006 and the said cheque came to be dishonoured on 11/12/2006 and the bank returned the said cheque with an endorsement âSinsufficient balanceâý on 12/12/2006. Notice under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was issued by respondent no. 2-original complainant upon the applicants on 20/12/2006 and the said notice was received by the respective applicant on 22/12/2006 and the same was replied by the applicants on 05/01/2007 and was sent on 10/01/2007 and received by respondent no. 2-original complainant on 11/01/2007 and, thereafter, the impugned complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 has been filed before the learned trial Court on 09/02/2007. It is submitted that as per Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is maintainable where a cheque has been presented within a period of six months from the date on which it is drawn or within the period of its validity, whichever is earlier and the payee or the holder i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.