SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.RAMANNA
Govind Ram Chanani – Appellant
Versus
Latha & Another – Respondent


Appearing Advocates: For the Appellant :Mohd. Usman Shaikh, Advocate. For the Respondents:A.N. Radhakrishna, Advocate.

Judgment :

All these appeals filed by the appellant-Govind Ram Chanani stated to be the authorised representative of M/s. Alloy Steel Emporium, Mathikere, Bangalore under Section 378(4) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 to set aside the order dated 8-2-2005 passed by the 18th Additional CMM and 20th Additional Small Causes Judge, Bangalore in C.C. Nos. 29538, 29138, 29139, 28960, 29540, 29137, 28961 and 29539 of 1999 allowing I.A. filed by the respondents/accused in the respective cases and consequently acquitted the respondents.

2. Thecase of the appellant is that appellant-Govind Ram Chanani described himself as a proprietor, M/s. Alloy Steel Emporium issued legal notice to respondents calling upon them to make good the cheque amount issued by them in favour of M/s. Alloy Steel Emporium but dishonoured by their banker for insufficient funds. The respondents did not comply with the demand of notice. Therefore, appellant filed complaints against respondents for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Court below, after taking cognizance, secured the presence of respondents and recorded their plea. Since the respondents pleaded not gui



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top