K.RAMANNA
P. V. Srinivasa Shetty – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Transport Company, – Respondent
K. Ramanna, J.—This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 30.7.2005 by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Harihar, in C.C. No. 799 of 2004 acquitting the respondent for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
2. Heard the arguments of the learned Counsel appearing on both sides and perused the documents.
3. The short point that arises for my consideration and decision is whether the appellant/complainant presented the cheque for encashment within six months from the date which is written on the cheque? If so, whether the order of acquittal passed by the Trial Court is perverse, incorrect or illegal?
4. It is seen that the appellant has filed the complaint through his power of attorney holder. The appellant-Company was running a period bunk dealing with the business of supply of petrol and diesel. The appellant had supplied petrol and diesel to the respondent to the tune of Rs.6,61,630/- and the cheque Ext. P2 drawn on State Bank of India, Harihar Branch, bearing No.0162016 for Rs.2 lacs came to be issued by the respondent to the appellant on 15.11.2003. Of co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.