SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRABIR KUMAR SAMANTA
Surya Newsprint and Papers – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. N. Srinivas with Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, for the appellants.
Mr. S.K. Sinha, for the respondent-Bank.

JUDGMENT

Prabir Kumar Samanta, Chairperson.— This appeal is directed the against judgment and order dated 20.1.2009 passed by the D.R.T., Cuttack in M.A. No. 566 of 2008 which arose out of the Original Application No. 187 of 2008.

2. The applicant-bank filed the aforesaid Original Application seeking recovery of the amount of Rs. 7,01,07,202/- (Rupees seven crores one lakh seven thousand two hundred two only) inclusive of interest up to 31.8.2008 from the defendants along with certain other reliefs. The defendant-borrowers entered appearance in the above Original Application and filed their written statement along with a counter-claim made therein.

3. The aforesaid defendants by making the aforesaid miscellaneous application has raised a preliminary issue as to the maintainability of the above claim case. It has been alleged that Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT, in short, hereinafter) has no jurisdiction to entertain and try the aforesaid Original Application against these defendants as Article 19 of the Memorandum of Association of the defendant No.1 company clearly stipulates that all disputes shall be subject to arbitration. It has been so contended by the defendants as because the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top