SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HARBANS LAL
Amarjit Singh – Appellant
Versus
Nazar Singh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Mukand Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

JUDGMENT

Harbans Lal, J.— This appeal is directed against the judgment/decree dated 1.3.07 passed by the court of learned Additional District Judge, Mansa whereby he dismissed the appeal preferred against the judgment/decree dated 15.12.06 vide which the court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Mansa, had dismissed the suit.

2. The factual basic terrafirma with brevity is that on 16.5.96, the defendant borrowered a sum of Rs. 5,80,000 from the plaintiff with the promise to repay the same on demand together with interest at the rate of Rs. 1,56% per month. In consideration thereof, he executed the pronote and receipt of even date in favour of the plaintiff. The defendant did not return this amount along with interest despite repeated requests. In answer to this claim, the defendant has inter alia pleaded that he is the owner of Bagi Filling Station, Fatta Maloka. In the year 1987-1988, he was doing LLB and he appointed the plaintiff as Manager of this Filling Station. After doing LLB and he appointed the plaintiff as Manager of this Filling Station. The plaintiff got registered an FIR bearing No. 36 dated 6.6.1997, Police Station Jhunir against the defendant who was kidnapped b




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top