SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.H.BHATIA
Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. , Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: S.V. Marwadi instructed by D’Souza

JUDGMENT

J.H. Bhatia, J.—Notice was issued to respondent Nos. 2 to 4, who are the original accused clearly indicating that this Writ Petition may be disposed of at the stage of admission. The notice was served as per the affidavit of service on behalf of the petitioner along with the postal receipts. However, none appeared for the respondent Nos. 2 to 4.

2. To state in brief, the writ petitioner is the original complainant. The respondent Nos. 2 to 4 are the original accused Nos.1, 2 and 3. Accused No.1 is a company situated at Alwar in Rajasthan. Accused Nos. 2 and 3 were the directors of accused No.1 and both of them were residing at Delhi. The complainant used to purchase mustard oil and packing material and to hand over the same to the accused at Alwar for the purpose of packing the same. The accused company used to charge packing charges from the complainant and hand packed material to the complainant. However, some oil was not packed and oil and packing material were not returned to the complainant. Therefore, the accused were liable to pay the price of the remaining oil and packing material. To discharge that liability, the accused persons issued a cheque No.712059 dated, 27-1





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top