J.H.BHATIA
Nitesh Jayanti Lal Jain – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
J.H. Bhatia, J.—Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The applicant before this Court is the original accused while respondent No. 2 is the original complainant. The complainant filed complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in Metropolitan Magistrate, 7th Court at Dadar and it came to be registered as criminal case No. 5342/SS/2005. According to complainant on the request of accused, he advanced loan of Rs.1,00,000 to the accused, which he assured to repay within the stipulated period. He issued postdated cheque dated 21.4.2005 in favour of the complainant. The cheque was drawn on Dena Bank, Worli Branch, Mumbai. The cheque was presented for encashment, but it was returned with return memo dated 27.5.2005 of Dena Bank and return memo dated 28.5.2005 from United Bank of India through which the complainant had presented cheque to Dena Bank. The endorsement from Dena Bank showed that the cheque was returned unpaid for “funds insufficient”. After that notice dated 25.6.2005, was issued calling upon the accused to make payment. The notice was received by him and he also replied to the said notice through his advocate on 8.7.2005. He failed to make paym
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.