A.P. Bhangale, J.—Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent of the parties.

2. The petitioner (original accused) questioned the order of issuance of process dated 15/03/2008 passed by the learned Magistrate, Wardha in Summary Criminal Case No. 213 of 2008 as also order dated 06/03/2010 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Wardha in Criminal Revision No. 6 of 2010 on ground that the learned trial Magistrate had no jurisdiction to entertain and try the complaint and besides erroneous findings were recorded on the question of territorial jurisdiction by the learned Magistrate. I have seen the original copy of the Criminal Complaint Case No. 213/2008; which indicates from the title itself that the complainant is resident of Wardha, Taluka & District – Wardha, while accused are resident of Nagpur. It appears the case of the complainant that cheque in the sum of Rs. 2,06,657/drawn upon Gandhibag Sahakari Bank Limited, Branch MIDC, Nagpur bearing cheque no. 461863, dated 20/10/2007 was issued by the accused which was presented by the complainant with State Bank of India, Civil Lines, Treasury Branch, Wardha for realization. The collecting banker by their intim