SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SHRIHARI P.DAVARE
Vikas – Appellant
Versus
Moreshwar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:V.S. Bedre, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Manjusha S. Jagtap, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Shrihari P. Davare, J.—Heard Mr. V.S. Bedre learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mrs. Manjusha S. Jagtap, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, petition is taken up for final hearing.

3. By the present petition preferred by the petitioner (original accused) under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 1.11.2009, passed by the learned 5th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ahmednagar, below Ex. 61, in STC No.2283 of 2008, thereby rejecting the application preferred by the petitioner herein under Section 311 of Code of Criminal Procedure.

4. Admittedly, the respondent herein (original complainant) filed S. T.C. Case No.2283 of 2008 against the petitioner herein (original accused) under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. After recording the verification of the complainant, the process came to be issued against the petitioner herein under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on 24.7.2008. Thereafter, the respondent herein filed affidavit in suppor




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top