N.A.BRITTO
Placida Cota – Appellant
Versus
National Marketing Company – Respondent
N.A. Britto, J.—These two Criminal Revision Application can be conveniently disposed of by this common judgment. The first is filed by the accused and is directed against judgment dated 10.11.2009 of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Margao upholding the conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The second has been filed by the complainant and is also directed against the same judgment of the learned Additional Scissions Judge, Margao modifying the sentence imposed upon the accused by the learned J.M.F.C.
2. The case of the complainant was that the complainant is a proprietary concern of Smt. Olga Monseratta and that the accused had issued a cheque No. 813735 dated 12.3.2004 for Rs.6,11,000 to the complainant towards payment of an amount of Rs.6,27,972 which was misappropriated by Shanti Cota in collusion with the accused and the said cheque when presented for payment on 13.3.2004 was returned dishonoured on the ground that the payment for payment was stopped by the drawer. The complainant sent notice dated 25.3.2004 demanding the said payment. The accused received the notice but did not comply with the same and, therefore, t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.