SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAJAN GUPTA
Amrit Paper – Appellant
Versus
Bharti International – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant:Mr. Suvineet Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Rajan Gupta, J.—The present application has been filed under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking special leave to appeal against the order dated 03.04.2010 vide which the complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act was dismissed by Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in view of amendment in Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant has a right to file appeal before the court of Sessions against the judgment of acquittal delivered by a Magistrate. He, therefore, prays that he may be allowed to withdraw this application under Section 378(4) Cr. P.C. with liberty to file an appeal before the court of Sessions.

3. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid, if permissible in law.

4. It is, however, directed that in case an application for condonation of delay is filed by the applicant, time period spent in pursuing the present application/appeal may be taken into consideration by the concerned court.

Application allowed.

*******


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top