T.P.SHARMA
Prashant – Appellant
Versus
Astha Innovation Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
T.P. Sharma, J.— Since the above petitions filed for quashment of criminal complaint cases are involving common question, they are being disposed of by this common order.
2. By filing Cr.M.P.No.215/2012 under Section 482 of the CrPC, the petitioners have challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 12.11.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur in Criminal Complaint Case No.832/2011, whereby the trial Court has registered complaint against the petitioners for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘the Act’).
3. By filing Cr.M.P.No.216/2012 under Section 482 of the CrPC, the petitioners have challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 11.10.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur in Criminal Complaint Case No.831/2011, whereby the trial Court has registered complaint against the petitioners for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Act.
4. By filing Cr.M.P.No.217/2012 under Section 482 of the CrPC, the petitioners have challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 8.11.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur in Criminal Complaint Case N
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.