SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

T.P.SHARMA
Prashant – Appellant
Versus
Astha Innovation Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Ashish A. Bhide with Mr. A.N. Bhakta, Advocates.

ORDER

T.P. Sharma, J.— Since the above petitions filed for quashment of criminal complaint cases are involving common question, they are being disposed of by this common order.

2. By filing Cr.M.P.No.215/2012 under Section 482 of the CrPC, the petitioners have challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 12.11.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur in Criminal Complaint Case No.832/2011, whereby the trial Court has registered complaint against the petitioners for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘the Act’).

3. By filing Cr.M.P.No.216/2012 under Section 482 of the CrPC, the petitioners have challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 11.10.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur in Criminal Complaint Case No.831/2011, whereby the trial Court has registered complaint against the petitioners for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Act.

4. By filing Cr.M.P.No.217/2012 under Section 482 of the CrPC, the petitioners have challenged legality and propriety of the order dated 8.11.2010 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur in Criminal Complaint Case N


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top