SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

T.P.SHARMA
Prakash Parakh – Appellant
Versus
Mahesh Kumar Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ramesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

ORDER

T.P. Sharma, J.— By this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘the Code’) the petitioner has challenged the illegality and propriety of the order dated 28.01.2012 passed by 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Jagdalpur in Criminal revision No. 3/2011 affirming the order dated 21.7.2009 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Keshkal in Criminal Case No. 649/2009 filed against the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘the Act’), whereby trial Court has issued the process against the petitioner.

2. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Sharma, counsel for the petitioner heard. Both the orders impugned, copy of complaint perused.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per para 10, 11 and 12 of the complaint, first notice under Section 138(c) of the Code has been issued on 1.5.2009 then second notice has been issued on 30.5.2009 and complaint has been filed within limitation from the receiving of second notice on 10.6.2009.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the present case first notice has been received un-served with endorsement that notice is not pres








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top