SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.BHAVADASAN
P. S. Ganesh – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:C. S. Manu, Advocate.
For the Respondent: T.R. Rajesh PP.

ORDER

P. Bhavadasan, J. — The accused was prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. He was found guilty. He was therefore convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000, and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. In appeal, the appellate court confirmed the conviction and sentence.

2. According to the complainant, the accused had borrowed a sum of Rs.1,00,000 from the complainant and to discharge the debt, the accused had issued Ext. P2 cheque. The cheque, on presentation, returned with the endorsement ‘Account closed’. Statutory notice issued to the accused invoked no reply and since the amount remained unpaid, the complaint was lodged by the complainant.

3. Cognizance of the offence was taken by the trial court. On summons, the accused entered appearance, and particulars of the offence were read out to the accused, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The complainant examined himself as PW1 and marked Exts. P1 to P6. After the close of the prosecution evidence, the accused was questioned under. Section 313 CrPC, in which he denied all












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top