SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.P.Bhangale
Yugalkishore Maniklal Bhattad – Appellant
Versus
krishna Gupta, Proprietor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.P. Bhangale, J.—The appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 6.7.2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, FC, Nagpur (Special Court under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act) in Summary Criminal Case No. 2543 of 2005 whereby the complaint was dismissed.

2. Briefly stated the facts are Complaint was filed on 29.11.2005 by the appellant against the respondent/accused complaining of an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant had advanced a sum of Rs. 50,000/to the accused on account of acquaintance with him. The accused had issued Cheque bearing No. 349135 dated 22.10.2005 drawn on the Nagpur Nagarik Sahakari bank Limited, Itwari Branch, Nagpur for Rs. 50,000/which was admittedly signed by him. This cheque was presented by complainant to the UCO Bank, Sitabuldi Branch, Nagpur, but was returned back on 22.10.2005 with the remarks “account closed”. Legal notice dated 27,10.2005 had been issued to the respondent herein by registered post A/D calling upon the accused to make payment within fifteen days. After the expiry of the statutory period, payment having not been received, complaint under Section 138 of
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top