Suresh Kait, J.—Since the facts of all the petitions are similar, therefore I have decided to dispose of all the petitions by a common judgment.

2. The brief facts of the case are that petitioner filed a complaint against the respondent/accused for the offences punishable under Section 460/420 Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 138 NI Act, 1881 (herein after referred to as “the Act”) on the allegations that the petitioner/complainant was dealing in Computer components and is the sole proprietor of M/s Sinco Technosys and have a show room at Nehru Place.

3. The respondent/accused was the tenant of the complainant and was in the same trade. He was in need of money and the petitioner/complainant advanced friendly loan to him. After some time, respondent/accused also asked the complainant for the same favour to his friend namely Ravinder on his personal guarantee and took money on his name.

4. In order to discharge his liability and his friend, respondent/accused had issued fourteen cheques in total. The details of the four cheques are as under:

Cheque No. Dated Amount

833203 02.08.2004 Rs.25,000/-

833204 02.08.2004 Rs.25,000/-

833205 02.08.2004 Rs.25,000/-

833206 02.08.2004 R