G.P.Mittal
Lodhi Property Company Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Rajbir Singh – Respondent
G.P. Mittal, J. —(Crl. L.P. 318/2012)
1. Leave granted.
2. Registry is directed to register the Petition as an Appeal.
Crl. A./12013
3. The Appellant invokes inherent power of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (the Code) for setting aside the order dated 30.03.2012 whereby a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the N.I. Act) was dismissed by the Metropolitan Magistrate (‘MM’) for non appearance of the Complainant, that is, the Petitioner herein and the accused, that is, the Respondent was acquitted.
4. As per the averments made in the Appeal, the Appellant have paid a sum of Rs.2.70 lacs to the Respondent for supply of certain goods. The Respondent failed to supply the goods and, therefore, issued a cheque No. 199005 dated 21.04.2009 towards the reimbursement of the amount. When the said cheque was presented by the Petitioner it was dishonoured on account of ‘insufficient funds’. A legal notice dated 30.04.2009 was served and on account of non-payment of the amount within the statutory period, a complaint under Section 138 of the N.I. Act was filed. A perusal of the Trial Court record reveals that Responden
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.