SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.K.PALIWAL
Lekhraj Singh Kushwah – Appellant
Versus
Brahmanand Tiwari – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:S.K. Shrivastava, Advocate.
For the Respondent:K.S. Shrivastava, Advocate.

ORDER

D.K. Paliwal, J.—This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is for quashing the order dated 4.8.2011 ‘passed by the Third ASJ. Vidisha, in Criminal Revision No.12/11, whereby order dated 24.11.10 passed by JMFC, Kurwai, in criminal Case No.37/2010 has been affirmed.

2. The brief facts’ of the case are that the respondent has filed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, (in short the Act) alleging that petitioner use to do agricultural work and also owns a nursery for which the petitioner borrowed a sum of Rs.74.000 from the respondent and in return gave an account payee cheque of Rs:74,000 of the State Bank of India dated 20.3.2009. It is further; alleged that when the respondent presented the cheque in Barbal branch of State Bank of India, the same was dishonoured. Thereafter, a registered notice was given to the petitioner, but the amount has not been paid. After inquiry the complaint has been registered and during the evidence, respondent was examined and cross-examined. After completion of the cross-examination, the respondent filed an application for amendment in the complaint before the trial court submitting that cheque N0.332534 has be















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top