V.P.VAISH
Rajeev Ranjan Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Sushil Kumar Saxena – Respondent
V.P. Vaish, J.—By way of this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 the petitioner seeks quashing of impugned order dated 21.7.2012 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate. Patiala House Courts, New Delhi whereby the petitioner was summoned for the offence punishable under Section 138 read with Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 in Complaint Case No.3231 I 12012 titled as Sushil Kumar Saxena v. M/s. Dream Scan Pvt. Ltd.
2. Learned counsel for- the petitioner submits that the cheque in question was not issued towards any debt or liability and the complainant had used stolen cheque. The petitioner had resigned on 27.1.2012. According to learned counsel for the petitioner, the provisions of Section 138/142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act are not attracted.
3. Learned counsel for both the parties has informed that notice under Section 251 of the Cr.P.C. in the complaint has not been given and hearing on framing of notice is yet to take place.
4. After hearing learned counsel for both the parties and upon perusal of record, this Court is of the opinion that inherent power of this Court under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. are not requir
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.