SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VED PRAKASH VAISH
Aditya Promoters Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
S. Karthikeyan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Sumit Bansal, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Ved Prakash Vaish, J.—The petitioner by filing the present petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’), has assailed order dated 30.8.2014 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate-(NI Act) Central-01, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi whereby the complaint has been returned to the petitioner/complainant for filing the same in the Court having territorial jurisdiction.

2. In a nut shell, the facts giving rise to the present petition are that the complainant is a limited company duly incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 4428, Ganesh Bazar, cloth Market, Delhi-110006 and was engaged in manufacturing and trading of crockery and allied items. The accused is the sole proprietor of M/s. Sri Lakshmi Corporation and has been purchasing crockery, glasses and plastic allied items, etc. from the complainant on credit basis from time to time through its sales office at Delhi. There was an outstanding balance of Rs.51,971 as on 1.5.2014, complainant issued debit note interest of Rs.4,158 which was confirmed by the accused firm and a sum of Rs.56,129 (Rupees was due after adjustment of all the p











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top