NAHEED ARA MOONIS
Super Computer and Network Prop Suraj Kumar Tasera – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
Naheed Ara Moonis, J. — Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Ashish Agarwal, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 and the learned AGA and have been taken through the record.
2. The instant application has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the order dated 26.9.2006 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Varanasi as well as the entire proceeding of the Complaint Case No. 216 of 2006, Ms. Agarwal Computers v. M/s Super Computers, under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate Varanasi.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants runs the business of computer and its appliances in the name and style of M/s Super Computer and Network in Mahalla Kadamtar Police Station City Kotwali District Mirzapur. The opposite party no.2 Mohan Lal Gupta is also running the business of P.C.S in the name of M/s Agarwal Computers. The applicants and the opposite party No.2 both having the common interest developed their good business rapport. The opposite party No.2 by adopting unfair and foul means got the blank cheque of the applicants and on the basis of which he is trying to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.