S.C.PARIJA
Prakiti Enterprisers – Appellant
Versus
Super Health Care – Respondent
S.C. Parija, J.—This writ petition has been filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying for quashing of the Complaint Case No.31064 of 2013, pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Chandigarh, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
2. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioner no.1 is a proprietorship firm dealing in pharmaceutical products and in course of business, it was appointed as the super distributor of opposite party. On being appointed as the super distributor, the petitioner No.1 firm issued three cheques in favour of the opposite party as security, without bearing any dates and amount, drawn on State Bank of India, Tulashipur Branch, Cuttack (Orissa). While issuing the said three cheques, the petitioner no.1 firm had intimated the opposite party that the cheques have been issued towards security. It is the case of the petitioners that subsequently, as the opposite party did not extend any support to the petitioner no.1 firm, it was not able to market the pharmaceutical products which had been received from the opposite party. Inspite of complaint, as no effective steps were taken by the opposite party to support
Harman Electronics Pvt. Ltd. & Another v. National Panasonic India Pvt. Ltd.
K. Bhaskaran v. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and another
Nishant Aggarwal v. Kailash Kumar Sharma
Escorts Limited v. Rama Mukherjee
Fil Industries Limited v. Imtiyaz Ahmed Bhat
Devendra Kishanlal Dagalia v. Dwarkesh Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.