SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VIPIN SANGHI
Inderjit Narula – Appellant
Versus
Rohit Dua – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Abinesh K. Mishra and Mr. S.S. Mishra, Advocates
For the Respondents:Mr. Anil Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Vipin Sanghi, J.—The aforesaid leave petitions have been preferred to assail the similar judgments rendered by Sh. Gajender Singh Nagar, MM-01 (Central), Karkardooma Courts (East), Delhi in four complaint cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act). The details of the complaint cases are as follows:

Crl LP No.

Complaint No.

Cheque No.

Amount

Dated & Bank

540/2014

5789/2010

415490

3,50,000

dt.12.08.2007 drawn on Syndicate Bank

541/2014

6617/2010

449125

2,85,000

dt. 04.04.2008 drawn on ICICI Bank

542/2014

5411/2010

462444

1,25,000

dt. 14.08.2007 drawn on ICICI Bank

576/2014

7128/2010

418124

50,000

dt. 15.10.2007 drawn on Syndicate Bank

2. By the impugned similar judgments, the learned MM has dismissed the said complaints preferred against the same respondent/accused Rohit Dua.

3. The case of the complainant was that the respondent/accused was a tenant at the relevant time of the complainant at Shop No.4RH, Shanker Market, Railway Road, Shahdara, Delhi for 7-8 months. The comp































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top