VIPIN SANGHI
Inderjit Narula – Appellant
Versus
Rohit Dua – Respondent
Vipin Sanghi, J.—The aforesaid leave petitions have been preferred to assail the similar judgments rendered by Sh. Gajender Singh Nagar, MM-01 (Central), Karkardooma Courts (East), Delhi in four complaint cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (the Act). The details of the complaint cases are as follows:
Crl LP No.
Complaint No.
Cheque No.
Amount
Dated & Bank
540/2014
5789/2010
415490
3,50,000
dt.12.08.2007 drawn on Syndicate Bank
541/2014
6617/2010
449125
2,85,000
dt. 04.04.2008 drawn on ICICI Bank
542/2014
5411/2010
462444
1,25,000
dt. 14.08.2007 drawn on ICICI Bank
576/2014
7128/2010
418124
50,000
dt. 15.10.2007 drawn on Syndicate Bank
2. By the impugned similar judgments, the learned MM has dismissed the said complaints preferred against the same respondent/accused Rohit Dua.
3. The case of the complainant was that the respondent/accused was a tenant at the relevant time of the complainant at Shop No.4RH, Shanker Market, Railway Road, Shahdara, Delhi for 7-8 months. The comp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.