SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.S.RAMANATHAN
United Travel Services – Appellant
Versus
PGC Textiles Corporation Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner: Mr.Abdukumar Rajaratnam for
M/s.Vijayalakshmi K. Rajaratnam, Advocates.

ORDER

R.S.Ramanathan, J.—The complainant in C.C.No.2303 of 2013 on the file of the Fast Track court No.II/Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore is the petitioner.

2. The petitioner/complainant filed the above complaint against the respondents under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 before XIV Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Egmore, chennai and the learned XIV Metropolitan Magistrate, after recording sworn statement, took cognizance of the case under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and transferred the case to Fast Track Court No.II, Egmore, Chennai and thereafter, summons was issued to the respondents and they entered appearance and the case was periodically adjourned. On 18.12.2014, the Fast Track Court No.II, Egmore, Chennai, passed an order returning the case records to the complainant/petitioner herein stating that as per the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court rendered in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod Versus State of Maharashtra and another, (2014) 9 Supreme Court Cases 129: 2014 (3) Crimes 162 (SC): 2014 (5) Supreme 641: 2014(3) CCC 164, the Court has no jurisdiction. This order is challenged in this petition.

3. Mr.Abdukumar Rajaratnam, learn

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top