SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VED PRAKASH VAISH
Rainee Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Ved Prakash Vaish, J.—These are three petitions filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter after referred to as “Cr.P.C.”) read with Article 227 of Constitution of India impugning the order dated 12.10.2010 passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi.

2. Since all these three petitions have arisen out of order dated 12.10.2007 and the question involved in all the petitions are similar, therefore, all the petitions are being disposed of together by this common order.

3. The concise facts giving rise to the present petitions are that respondent No.2 had filed a complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, “NI Act”) in respect of dishonour of cheques in each complaint case. Despite service of notice, petitioners had failed to make the payment of cheques. Thus, respondent No.2 had filed a complaint for the offence punishable under Sections 138/142 of NI Act against the petitioners. Vide impugned order dated 12.10.2010, learned trial court took cognizance and summoned the petitioners. Feeling aggrieved by the said order, the petitioners have preferred the present petitions.

4. Learned counsel for the petition



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top